Gaza protests against two Democrats spark outcry and debate on tactics

Two recent incidents involving US congressional candidates on opposite coasts have blown up into major controversies, underscoring how the Israel-Palestine conflict has transformed US elections – and illustrating how aggressive protest tactics can spark backlash that overshadows the issues activists meant to highlight.

Scott Wiener, a gay Jewish state senator and trans rights advocate who is currently the frontrunner in the race to replace the longtime representative Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th district, said he felt forced to leave last week’s annual trans pride march in San Francisco after a group of people ran up to him at a local park where the event was taking place, surrounded him and screamed at him over his positions on Israel’s war on Gaza.

“They were so physically and verbally aggressive that it was impossible for me to safely remain in the park,” Wiener said in a statement shortly after the incident, which was also filmed and shared on social media by a local activist. The video shows activists surrounding Wiener and screaming profanities at him, with one of them at one point saying: “You stopped being queer the moment you started supporting Israel.”

“I have no objection whatsoever to anyone disagreeing with me, opposing me or protesting me,” Wiener said. “But when opposition and disagreement transition to harassment, including cornering me, touching me or trying to physically bully me out of a public event, that crosses a line.”

The episode sparked widespread condemnation from scores of elected officials – including Pelosi and Wiener’s opponent in the congressional race, Connie Chan.

The other incident occurred last month in New York City, where a Brooklyn coffee shop said in a since-deleted social media post that had staff recognized him, they would have turned away the Democratic congressman Dan Goldman, who had been at the cafe with his daughter earlier that day, over his support for Israel. “We don’t serve racists, fascists, homophobes, genocide enablers, or anyone in between,” the post read.

The incident sparked immediate backlash, with some accusing the shop of antisemitism. The US justice department’s civil rights division has said it is investigating the cafe for potentially discriminating against a patron “based on their race, religion or national origin”. In an interview with CNN, Goldman called the episode “sad” but said he would rather the justice department spend its resources “investigating antisemitism against people who do not have a platform that I do, who are not elected officials”.

Goldman, an Israel supporter who was endorsed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) and received funding from aligned political action committees, has since lost his primary to Brad Lander. Both are Jewish, but Lander is far more critical of Israel, a stance that helped propel him to a resounding victory in the progressive Brooklyn and Manhattan district Goldman had represented. Goldman has since said that his support for Israel has cost him the election.

“Ultimately this really did come down to Israel-Gaza,” he said in an interview with CNN. “It has taken on a massive and outsized role in Democratic politics.”

Goldman’s loss was perhaps the most vivid example of how reflexive support for Israel – once viewed as a prerequisite for political viability – is no longer a safe bet, and many otherwise progressive Democrats are learning that the hard way as a number have lost seats in recent primaries to unabashedly pro-Palestinian challengers.

“It used to be that politicians on the broader left could be progressive on many issues except for Palestine, but that’s really not the case anymore,” Ashik Siddique, co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America, which has backed many such candidates, said in a recent interview. “It has become a very clear litmus test.”

Police set up barricades as protesters gather outside a Poetica coffee shop in Brooklyn on 24 June 2026. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

A week after the confrontation between Wiener and the pro-Palestinian protesters in San Francisco, some Jewish activists have denounced the ensuing backlash as a distraction from the crimes against Palestinians that were the protesters’ focus.

Wiener, who is known as one of California’s more progressive state legislators, has introduced a number of pro-LGBT+ bills, even as he has faced criticism from some San Francisco leftists on other issues, including homelessness and housing. But he has faced the most pointed backlash, including from Jewish and trans constituents, over his initial hesitation to name Israel’s actions in Gaza a “genocide”, as well as his championing of state legislation aimed at combating antisemitism in schools that critics say undermines teachers’ ability to speak truthfully about Palestine.

Wiener has been critical of the government of Benjamin Netanyahu and has said that if elected to Congress he would not approve US military aid to Israel. But at a January debate he declined to describe Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide. He subsequently embraced the term in a video statement, leaving pro-Palestinian critics dissatisfied that his changed stance came too late, and pro-Israel ones accusing him of having caved to pressure.

As controversy surrounding the incident at the trans march escalated over the past week, the protest’s organizers issued a lengthy statement saying that Wiener was “at no point in danger” and accusing him of having used the confrontation in “fundraising communication”. The group also noted that the focus on Wiener was a distraction from the aggressive police response at the event, which ended with several people arrested.

“Trans March participants holding politicians accountable is nothing new,” they wrote. “We are particularly disappointed that, while Senator Wiener continues to amplify this incident from Friday in national press interviews, he has failed to address the harm and disproportionate response from [the San Francisco police department] inflicted upon transgender people, children, families and their allies”.

Jewish Voice for Peace’s San Francisco chapter argued in a statement that outrage over the incident involving Wiener was “misplaced”.

“Israel has killed tens of thousands of Palestinian children in Gaza, destroyed most schools and bombed most hospitals. Not only is this horror funded by our tax dollars, it has also been supported and enabled by many of our supposedly progressive leaders,” the group wrote. “That’s what should generate outrage, not a few angry words from someone speaking out against genocide.”

A member of the group who was at the protest and said she witnessed Wiener be marched out of the park said she was “glad to see him confronted”.

“Trans liberation is a resistance to the same fascist forces occupying Palestine. Wiener’s support of the occupation is in direct opposition to what Trans March is all about,” the participant, who identifies as “a queer anti-Zionist Jew” but asked not to be named, said. “We cannot have safety and liberation for trans people, for Jews, for immigrants or any other people until Palestine is free.”

‘It’s not effective’

Pro-Israel critics seized on last week’s incident to argue that Wiener had capitulated to leftist “mobs” and pointed to his supposed failure of their “purity test” as an indication that the left would “eat its own” and a warning against trying to “appease” it.

On the left, some lamented how the activists’ tactics led to controversy that has not helped the cause of Palestinian liberation.

Peter Beinart, a writer and political commentator who has grown increasingly critical of Israel over the years and whose latest book deals with “being Jewish after the destruction of Gaza”, addressed the Wiener incident in a video posted to his Substack.

He argued that the protesters who confronted Wiener were “behaving like assholes” and that he had slowly moved on his support for Israel in response to public opinion shifts. “It’s not effective in moving people even further – and I would like him to go further than he is now – by treating people this way,” he wrote.

Beinart also spoke of his frustration that the incident was consuming the attention of many in the Jewish community and invited people to seek to understand where the “rage” displayed by protesters was coming from.

“Imagine that these people who are watching this Scott Wiener video were also reading the new UN report that just came out about what Israel has done to Palestinian children ,” he said.

He then went on to detail the report’s findings: “Israel has killed at least 20,000 children in Gaza since October 7, injured at least 44,000. Of the children it has killed, at least 5,000 were under the age of five. It has killed more than 5,000 children under the age of five, and more than 1,000 children under the age of one.”