You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
The request to extend a high-profile warrantless surveillance law would add a thorny issue during waning Republican control.

By Charlie Savage and Dustin Volz
Charlie Savage and Dustin Volz write about national security including surveillance policy. They reported from Washington.
Nov. 13, 2026, 6:10 p.m. ET
The Trump administration pressed top lawmakers on Friday to extend a high-profile warrantless surveillance law within the next month, moving to resolve a thorny policy dispute in the last weeks of a Republican-controlled Congress.
In a letter to congressional leaders, three top national security officials in the administration — Todd Blanche, the attorney general, Jay Clayton, the director of national intelligence, and John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director — said President Trump had urged them to extend the law known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act now.
“As you know, Section 702 is the single most indispensable tool we have to keep our homeland and the American people safe,” they wrote. “It enables our intelligence community to detect and disrupt terrorist plots, cyber intrusions, and weapons proliferation. No other authority can replace it.”
But any push to bring a Section 702 bill to the floor — either by itself, or bundled with some larger package like the annual National Defense Authorization Act — appeared likely to set off a new round of heated contention. Privacy and civil liberties advocates in both parties have been pushing to add new limits, like requiring the government to obtain permission from a judge before deliberately gaining access to the messages of Americans swept up under the program.
In a statement, Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat and proponent of adding more limits to the program, said the issue should wait for the next Congress, when Democrats will have control.

German (DE)
English (US)
Spanish (ES)
French (FR)
Hindi (IN)
Italian (IT)
Russian (RU)
36 minutes ago























Comments